Hyundai's line of vehicles. Public discussion board.

Non-official site. Group discussion board devoted to H vehicles.

2011 Models: When ? (and, a thanks for all the previous help)

Hello,

First, thanks to all for all the very good info from my previous posts.
Appreciate it very much.

Any idea when the new model 2011 will start appearing ?

Thanks,
Bob

Comments (9)




9 Responses to “2011 Models: When ? (and, a thanks for all the previous help)”

  1. admin says:

    Bob wrote:
    > Hello,

    > First, thanks to all for all the very good info from my previous posts.
    > Appreciate it very much.

    > Any idea when the new model 2011 will start appearing ?

    > Thanks,
    > Bob

    My dealer already has what looked like a 2011 Sonata.  I didn’t get up
    close to it as it was in the garage undergoing, I’m surmising, dealer
    prep.  It did look better in person than in the pictures, but it is
    going to take some getting used to.

    It looks like the visibility will be much poorer than my 2006, but then
    almost all new cars seem to have visibility that sucks.  I guess
    everyone is copying the "gangster" look that Chrysler started with the 300.

    I much prefer a lower beltline and taller windows than appears to now be
    in vogue on new cars.

    Matt

  2. admin says:

    In message <0O%cn.70711$RS6….@newsfe15.iad>, Voyager
    <m.whit…@computer.org> writes
    >I much prefer a lower beltline and taller windows than appears to now
    >be in vogue on new cars.

    I would suspect that the "lower windows" is part of the design to reduce
    drag, therefore increasing mpg.

    Clive

  3. admin says:

    "Clive" <Cl…@yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote in message

    news:r9pxYoMudMdLFwZo@yewbank.demon.co.uk…

    > In message <0O%cn.70711$RS6….@newsfe15.iad>, Voyager
    > <m.whit…@computer.org> writes
    >>I much prefer a lower beltline and taller windows than appears to now be
    >>in vogue on new cars.
    > I would suspect that the "lower windows" is part of the design to reduce
    > drag, therefore increasing mpg.
    > —
    > Clive

    It also has to do with side impact crash standards.  It is easier to put the
    needed strength in the higher doors.   I’ve not been in one of the Chrysler
    cars, but to me, they look ugly with the short windows

  4. admin says:

    Clive wrote:
    > In message <0O%cn.70711$RS6….@newsfe15.iad>, Voyager
    > <m.whit…@computer.org> writes
    >> I much prefer a lower beltline and taller windows than appears to now
    >> be in vogue on new cars.
    > I would suspect that the "lower windows" is part of the design to reduce
    > drag, therefore increasing mpg.

    I don’t think so as the overall height of the cars isn’t much if any
    less, it is just that the beltline is higher now.

    Matt

  5. admin says:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

    Ed Pawlowski wrote:

    > "Clive" <Cl…@yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
    > news:r9pxYoMudMdLFwZo@yewbank.demon.co.uk…
    >> In message <0O%cn.70711$RS6….@newsfe15.iad>, Voyager
    >> <m.whit…@computer.org> writes
    >>> I much prefer a lower beltline and taller windows than appears to now
    >>> be in vogue on new cars.
    >> I would suspect that the "lower windows" is part of the design to
    >> reduce drag, therefore increasing mpg.
    >> —
    >> Clive

    > It also has to do with side impact crash standards.  It is easier to put
    > the needed strength in the higher doors.   I’ve not been in one of the
    > Chrysler cars, but to me, they look ugly with the short windows

    Yes, I suspect that is one of the reasons, but I think simply style is
    the other.  I think almost all of the cars with the short windows look
    ugly, although the cars like the Camaro and Challenger look OK that way.
      The new Hyundai isn’t as ugly as the Chrysler, but it sure has shorter
    windows than my 06, at least judging from a distance.

    Matt

  6. admin says:

    Probably be the opposite to you blokes in the USA but in Australia I find
    smaller windows let in less heat. Prefer the larger window looks but harder
    on the ventilation/aircon
                                         John

  7. admin says:

    John wrote:
    > Probably be the opposite to you blokes in the USA but in Australia I find
    > smaller windows let in less heat. Prefer the larger window looks but harder
    > on the ventilation/aircon
    >                                      John

    This could certainly be a concern for parts of the US, however, often
    heavily tinted windows are the solution to that problem.

    Matt

  8. admin says:

    "Voyager" <m.whit…@computer.org> wrote in message

    news:abpdn.50394$zN4.28474@newsfe05.iad…

    > John wrote:
    >> Probably be the opposite to you blokes in the USA but in Australia I find
    >> smaller windows let in less heat. Prefer the larger window looks but
    >> harder on the ventilation/aircon
    >>                                      John

    > This could certainly be a concern for parts of the US, however, often
    > heavily tinted windows are the solution to that problem.

    > Matt

    The color of the car makes quite a difference too.  My silver blue was much
    cooler in the summer than the two previous cars, a dark green and burgundy
    one.  In the southwest, white is a very common color.  I’ve never had a
    black car, nor do I want one.  Present car is dark cherry.  Sure shows the
    dirt more too.

    As for tint, some states do have restriction on the front windows as to how
    dark they can be.  Police want to be able to see you and be sure you have no
    weapons.

  9. admin says:

    In message <SaydndtLvLmtvOvWnZ2dnUVZ_vSdn…@giganews.com>, Ed Pawlowski
    <e…@snetnospam.net> writes
    >As for tint, some states do have restriction on the front windows as to
    >how dark they can be.  Police want to be able to see you and be sure
    >you have no weapons.

    In the UK, it’s illegal to have either windscreen or front door windows
    tinted.

    Clive

Place your comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.